You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Deep brain stimulation for treatment-refractory obsessive compulsive disorder: a systematic review
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Psychiatry, August 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12888-014-0214-y |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sina Kohl, Deva M Schönherr, Judy Luigjes, Damiaan Denys, Ulf J Mueller, Doris Lenartz, Veerle Visser-Vandewalle, Jens Kuhn |
Abstract |
Obsessive-compulsive disorder is one of the most disabling of all psychiatric illnesses. Despite available pharmacological and psychotherapeutic treatments about 10% of patients remain severely affected and are considered treatment-refractory. For some of these patients deep brain stimulation offers an appropriate treatment method. The scope of this article is to review the published data and to compare different target structures and their effectiveness. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 194 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Japan | 1 | <1% |
China | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 187 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 19% |
Researcher | 34 | 18% |
Student > Master | 21 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 20 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 7% |
Other | 41 | 21% |
Unknown | 28 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 51 | 26% |
Neuroscience | 33 | 17% |
Psychology | 32 | 16% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 7% |
Engineering | 11 | 6% |
Other | 14 | 7% |
Unknown | 39 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 361. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2022.
All research outputs
#86,418
of 25,046,311 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#18
of 5,339 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#692
of 235,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#2
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,046,311 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,339 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,746 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.