↓ Skip to main content

A high-throughput cellulase screening system based on droplet microfluidics

Overview of attention for article published in Biomicrofluidics, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
8 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
206 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A high-throughput cellulase screening system based on droplet microfluidics
Published in
Biomicrofluidics, July 2014
DOI 10.1063/1.4886771
Pubmed ID
Authors

Raluca Ostafe, Radivoje Prodanovic, W. Lloyd Ung, David A. Weitz, Rainer Fischer

Abstract

A new ultra-high-throughput screening assay for the detection of cellulase activity was developed based on microfluidic sorting. Cellulase activity is detected using a series of coupled enzymes leading to the formation of a fluorescent product that can be detected on a chip. Using this method, we have achieved up to 300-fold enrichments of the active population of cells and greater than 90% purity after just one sorting round. In addition, we proved that we can sort the cellulase-expressing cells from mixtures containing less than 1% active cells.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 206 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 197 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 55 27%
Researcher 32 16%
Student > Master 21 10%
Student > Bachelor 16 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 6%
Other 25 12%
Unknown 44 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 46 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 16%
Engineering 32 16%
Chemistry 16 8%
Physics and Astronomy 8 4%
Other 19 9%
Unknown 52 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2024.
All research outputs
#8,071,288
of 26,154,283 outputs
Outputs from Biomicrofluidics
#207
of 845 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,560
of 243,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biomicrofluidics
#1
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,154,283 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 845 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,821 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.