↓ Skip to main content

PhenoWorld: a new paradigm to screen rodent behavior

Overview of attention for article published in Translational Psychiatry, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
PhenoWorld: a new paradigm to screen rodent behavior
Published in
Translational Psychiatry, June 2014
DOI 10.1038/tp.2014.40
Pubmed ID
Authors

M Castelhano-Carlos, P S Costa, H Russig, N Sousa

Abstract

Modeling depression in animals has inherent complexities that are augmented by intrinsic difficulties to measure the characteristic features of the disorder. Herein, we describe the PhenoWorld (PhW), a new setting in which groups of six rats lived in an ethological enriched environment, and have their feeding, locomotor activity, sleeping and social behavior automatically monitored. A battery of emotional and cognitive tests was used to characterize the behavioral phenotype of animals living in the PhW and in standard conditions (in groups of six and two rats), after exposure to an unpredictable chronic mild stress paradigm (uCMS) and antidepressants. Data reveal that animals living in the PhW displayed similar, but more striking, behavioral differences when exposed to uCMS, such as increased behavioral despair shown in the forced swimming test, resting/sleep behavior disturbances and reduced social interactions. Moreover, several PhW-cage behaviors, such as spontaneous will to go for food or exercise in running wheels, proved to be sensitive indicators of depressive-like behavior. In summary, this new ethological enriched paradigm adds significant discriminative power to screen depressive-like behavior, in particularly rodent's hedonic behavior.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Unknown 105 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 13%
Student > Master 13 12%
Student > Bachelor 12 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 25 23%
Unknown 20 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 25 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 17%
Psychology 9 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Other 16 15%
Unknown 30 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2020.
All research outputs
#6,406,371
of 22,759,618 outputs
Outputs from Translational Psychiatry
#1,703
of 3,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,294
of 229,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Translational Psychiatry
#14
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,759,618 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,217 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.6. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,147 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.