↓ Skip to main content

Angiogenesis inhibitors for the treatment of ovarian cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Angiogenesis inhibitors for the treatment of ovarian cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007930.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kezia Gaitskell, Igor Martinek, Andrew Bryant, Sean Kehoe, Shibani Nicum, Jo Morrison

Abstract

Many women with ovarian cancer eventually develop resistance to conventional chemotherapy drugs, and so novel agents are being developed to target specific molecular pathways. One such class of drugs inhibits angiogenesis (the development of new blood vessels), which is essential for tumour growth. It is important to establish whether the addition of these new drugs to conventional chemotherapy regimens improves survival, and what the side-effects may be.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ecuador 2 2%
Spain 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 110 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 17%
Researcher 19 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 15%
Student > Bachelor 16 14%
Student > Postgraduate 6 5%
Other 18 16%
Unknown 19 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 51%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Computer Science 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Other 13 11%
Unknown 21 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2020.
All research outputs
#4,190,011
of 15,606,317 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,784
of 11,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,607
of 98,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#24
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,606,317 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,222 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.3. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,838 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.