You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 78 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||41||53%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||19||24%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||2||3%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Doctoral Student||2||10%|
|Professor > Associate Professor||2||10%|
|Student > Master||2||10%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||11||55%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||5||25%|
|Immunology and Microbiology||1||5%|
|Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science||1||5%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 65. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2016.
All research outputs
of 24,140,950 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Internal Medicine
of 5,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 241,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Internal Medicine
of 134 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,140,950 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,131 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 162.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,568 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 134 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.