↓ Skip to main content

Hyporheic flow and transport processes: Mechanisms, models, and biogeochemical implications

Overview of attention for article published in Reviews of Geophysics, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
395 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
391 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hyporheic flow and transport processes: Mechanisms, models, and biogeochemical implications
Published in
Reviews of Geophysics, October 2014
DOI 10.1002/2012rg000417
Authors

F. Boano, J. W. Harvey, A. Marion, A. I. Packman, R. Revelli, L. Ridolfi, A. Wörman

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 391 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 382 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 118 30%
Student > Master 69 18%
Researcher 61 16%
Student > Bachelor 19 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 5%
Other 60 15%
Unknown 46 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 124 32%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 92 24%
Engineering 63 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 7%
Mathematics 2 <1%
Other 11 3%
Unknown 70 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2020.
All research outputs
#12,733,334
of 16,682,934 outputs
Outputs from Reviews of Geophysics
#559
of 627 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,222
of 197,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reviews of Geophysics
#8
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,682,934 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 627 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,159 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.