↓ Skip to main content

Pneumococcal vaccines for cystic fibrosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pneumococcal vaccines for cystic fibrosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008865.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura Burgess, Kevin W Southern, Burgess L, Southern KW, Burgess, Laura, Southern, Kevin W

Abstract

Invasive pneumococcal disease is associated with significant mortality and many countries have introduced routine pneumococcal vaccination into their childhood immunisation programmes. Whilst pneumococcal disease in cystic fibrosis is uncommon, pneumococcal immunisation may offer some protection against pulmonary exacerbations caused by this pathogen. In the USA and UK pneumococcal vaccination is currently recommended for all children and adults with cystic fibrosis.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 67%
Student > Master 1 33%
Other 1 33%
Student > Postgraduate 1 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 33%
Other 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 100%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 67%
Psychology 1 33%
Computer Science 1 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2017.
All research outputs
#3,311,203
of 12,492,295 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,322
of 8,736 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,927
of 193,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#134
of 195 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,492,295 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,736 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,496 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 195 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.