Title |
Veno-venous ECMO: a synopsis of nine key potential challenges, considerations, and controversies
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Anesthesiology, August 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2253-14-65 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
David B Tulman, Stanislaw P A Stawicki, Bryan A Whitson, Saarik C Gupta, Ravi S Tripathi, Michael S Firstenberg, Don Hayes, Xuzhong Xu, Thomas J Papadimos |
Abstract |
Following the 2009 H1N1 Influenza pandemic, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) emerged as a viable alternative in selected, severe cases of ARDS. Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) is a major public health problem. Average medical costs for ARDS survivors on an annual basis are multiple times those dedicated to a healthy individual. Advances in medical and ventilatory management of severe lung injury and ARDS have improved outcomes in some patients, but these advances fail to consistently "rescue" a significant proportion of those affected. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 142 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 24 | 17% |
Researcher | 20 | 14% |
Student > Master | 16 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 12 | 8% |
Other | 38 | 26% |
Unknown | 22 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 79 | 55% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 7% |
Engineering | 5 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 2% |
Other | 18 | 13% |
Unknown | 25 | 17% |