↓ Skip to main content

Making fair choices on the path to universal health coverage

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of the World Health Organization, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
241 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Making fair choices on the path to universal health coverage
Published in
Bulletin of the World Health Organization, June 2014
DOI 10.2471/blt.14.139139
Pubmed ID
Authors

Trygve Ottersen, Ole F Norheim

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 1%
India 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Kenya 1 1%
Unknown 77 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 19%
Researcher 10 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 11%
Student > Postgraduate 7 9%
Professor 5 6%
Other 18 22%
Unknown 17 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 27%
Social Sciences 14 17%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 5%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 19 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2024.
All research outputs
#3,234,032
of 25,988,468 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of the World Health Organization
#92
of 599 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,344
of 242,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of the World Health Organization
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,988,468 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 599 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,158 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.