↓ Skip to main content

What are the impacts of nature conservation interventions on human well-being: a systematic map protocol

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Evidence, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#25 of 137)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
16 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
What are the impacts of nature conservation interventions on human well-being: a systematic map protocol
Published in
Environmental Evidence, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/2047-2382-3-16
Authors

Madeleine Bottrill, Samantha Cheng, Ruth Garside, Supin Wongbusarakum, Dilys Roe, Margaret B Holland, Janet Edmond, Will R Turner

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 4%
South Africa 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 125 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 22%
Student > Master 27 20%
Researcher 26 19%
Student > Bachelor 11 8%
Student > Postgraduate 10 7%
Other 31 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 51 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 21%
Social Sciences 16 12%
Unspecified 12 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 8 6%
Other 19 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2015.
All research outputs
#646,023
of 11,244,871 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#25
of 137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,309
of 188,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,244,871 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 137 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,159 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.