↓ Skip to main content

What are the impacts of nature conservation interventions on human well-being: a systematic map protocol

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Evidence, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#45 of 208)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
17 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
155 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
What are the impacts of nature conservation interventions on human well-being: a systematic map protocol
Published in
Environmental Evidence, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/2047-2382-3-16
Authors

Madeleine Bottrill, Samantha Cheng, Ruth Garside, Supin Wongbusarakum, Dilys Roe, Margaret B Holland, Janet Edmond, Will R Turner

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 3%
India 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 144 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 22%
Student > Master 30 19%
Researcher 28 18%
Student > Postgraduate 12 8%
Student > Bachelor 12 8%
Other 29 19%
Unknown 10 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 60 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 21%
Social Sciences 17 11%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 9 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 5%
Other 12 8%
Unknown 17 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2020.
All research outputs
#1,101,318
of 15,370,792 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#45
of 208 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,044
of 195,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,370,792 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 208 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,107 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them