↓ Skip to main content

Training Signaling Pathway Maps to Biochemical Data with Constrained Fuzzy Logic: Quantitative Analysis of Liver Cell Responses to Inflammatory Stimuli

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
115 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
277 Mendeley
citeulike
6 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Training Signaling Pathway Maps to Biochemical Data with Constrained Fuzzy Logic: Quantitative Analysis of Liver Cell Responses to Inflammatory Stimuli
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, March 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1001099
Pubmed ID
Authors

Melody K. Morris, Julio Saez-Rodriguez, David C. Clarke, Peter K. Sorger, Douglas A. Lauffenburger

Abstract

Predictive understanding of cell signaling network operation based on general prior knowledge but consistent with empirical data in a specific environmental context is a current challenge in computational biology. Recent work has demonstrated that Boolean logic can be used to create context-specific network models by training proteomic pathway maps to dedicated biochemical data; however, the Boolean formalism is restricted to characterizing protein species as either fully active or inactive. To advance beyond this limitation, we propose a novel form of fuzzy logic sufficiently flexible to model quantitative data but also sufficiently simple to efficiently construct models by training pathway maps on dedicated experimental measurements. Our new approach, termed constrained fuzzy logic (cFL), converts a prior knowledge network (obtained from literature or interactome databases) into a computable model that describes graded values of protein activation across multiple pathways. We train a cFL-converted network to experimental data describing hepatocytic protein activation by inflammatory cytokines and demonstrate the application of the resultant trained models for three important purposes: (a) generating experimentally testable biological hypotheses concerning pathway crosstalk, (b) establishing capability for quantitative prediction of protein activity, and (c) prediction and understanding of the cytokine release phenotypic response. Our methodology systematically and quantitatively trains a protein pathway map summarizing curated literature to context-specific biochemical data. This process generates a computable model yielding successful prediction of new test data and offering biological insight into complex datasets that are difficult to fully analyze by intuition alone.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 277 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 12 4%
United Kingdom 4 1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 250 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 81 29%
Researcher 79 29%
Student > Master 23 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 16 6%
Student > Bachelor 16 6%
Other 43 16%
Unknown 19 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 123 44%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 43 16%
Engineering 26 9%
Computer Science 19 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 6%
Other 25 9%
Unknown 24 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2011.
All research outputs
#16,864,870
of 25,576,801 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#7,254
of 9,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,813
of 120,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#47
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,576,801 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,003 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,301 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.