↓ Skip to main content

Duration of treatment with vitamin K antagonists in symptomatic venous thromboembolism

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
9 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Duration of treatment with vitamin K antagonists in symptomatic venous thromboembolism
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001367.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Saskia Middeldorp, Martin H Prins, Barbara A Hutten

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 62 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 19%
Researcher 9 14%
Unspecified 8 13%
Other 8 13%
Student > Master 7 11%
Other 20 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 52%
Unspecified 16 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 11%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 3%
Other 4 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2016.
All research outputs
#1,947,109
of 12,527,219 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,387
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,747
of 193,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#117
of 212 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,219 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,095 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 212 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.