You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Effectiveness of Common Household Cleaning Agents in Reducing the Viability of Human Influenza A/H1N1
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, February 2010
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0008987 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jane S. Greatorex, Rosanna F. Page, Martin D. Curran, Paul Digard, Joanne E. Enstone, Tim Wreghitt, Penny P. Powell, Darren W. Sexton, Roberto Vivancos, Jonathan S. Nguyen-Van-Tam |
Abstract |
In the event of an influenza pandemic, the majority of people infected will be nursed at home. It is therefore important to determine simple methods for limiting the spread of the virus within the home. The purpose of this work was to test a representative range of common household cleaning agents for their effectiveness at killing or reducing the viability of influenza A virus. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 426 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 151 | 35% |
United States | 13 | 3% |
Australia | 11 | 3% |
Ireland | 9 | 2% |
Canada | 6 | 1% |
Spain | 4 | <1% |
Switzerland | 2 | <1% |
Korea, Democratic People's Republic of | 2 | <1% |
New Zealand | 2 | <1% |
Other | 15 | 4% |
Unknown | 211 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 375 | 88% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 18 | 4% |
Scientists | 17 | 4% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 16 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Norway | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 92 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 17 | 18% |
Student > Bachelor | 13 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 13% |
Student > Master | 9 | 10% |
Other | 8 | 9% |
Other | 13 | 14% |
Unknown | 21 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 15% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 12% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 6% |
Engineering | 6 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 5% |
Other | 27 | 29% |
Unknown | 24 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 588. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2024.
All research outputs
#40,475
of 25,909,281 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#662
of 226,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82
of 175,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#3
of 652 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,909,281 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 226,020 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,899 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 652 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.