↓ Skip to main content

Moderate-Vigorous Physical Activity across Body Mass Index in Females: Moderating Effect of Endocannabinoids and Temperament

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Moderate-Vigorous Physical Activity across Body Mass Index in Females: Moderating Effect of Endocannabinoids and Temperament
Published in
PLOS ONE, August 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0104534
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fernando Fernández-Aranda, Sarah Sauchelli, Antoni Pastor, Marcela L. Gonzalez, Rafael de la Torre, Roser Granero, Susana Jiménez-Murcia, Rosa Baños, Cristina Botella, Jose M. Fernández-Real, Jose C. Fernández-García, Gema Frühbeck, Javier Gómez-Ambrosi, Roser Rodríguez, Francisco J. Tinahones, Jon Arcelus, Ana B. Fagundo, Zaida Agüera, Jordi Miró, Felipe F. Casanueva

Abstract

Endocannabinoids and temperament traits have been linked to both physical activity and body mass index (BMI) however no study has explored how these factors interact in females. The aims of this cross-sectional study were to 1) examine differences among distinct BMI groups on daytime physical activity and time spent in moderate-vigorous physical activity (MVPA), temperament traits and plasma endocannabinoid concentrations; and 2) explore the association and interaction between MVPA, temperament, endocannabinoids and BMI.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 5 4%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Unknown 106 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 17%
Student > Bachelor 17 15%
Researcher 14 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 11%
Student > Master 11 10%
Other 26 23%
Unknown 14 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 22 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 16%
Sports and Recreations 11 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 5%
Other 24 21%
Unknown 26 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2018.
All research outputs
#6,510,541
of 25,418,993 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#92,893
of 221,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,251
of 241,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,323
of 4,709 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,418,993 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 221,469 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,530 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,709 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.