You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Spanish Mediterranean diet and other dietary patterns and breast cancer risk: case–control EpiGEICAM study
|
---|---|
Published in |
British Journal of Cancer, August 2014
|
DOI | 10.1038/bjc.2014.434 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
A Castelló, M Pollán, B Buijsse, A Ruiz, A M Casas, J M Baena-Cañada, V Lope, S Antolín, M Ramos, M Muñoz, A Lluch, A de Juan-Ferré, C Jara, M A Jimeno, P Rosado, E Díaz, V Guillem, E Carrasco, B Pérez-Gómez, J Vioque, H Boeing, M Martín |
Abstract |
Although there are solid findings regarding the detrimental effect of alcohol consumption, the existing evidence on the effect of other dietary factors on breast cancer (BC) risk is inconclusive. This study aimed to evaluate the association between dietary patterns and risk of BC in Spanish women, stratifying by menopausal status and tumour subtype, and to compare the results with those of Alternate Healthy Index (AHEI) and Alternate Mediterranean Diet Score (aMED). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 47 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 11 | 23% |
United States | 3 | 6% |
Germany | 1 | 2% |
Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
Belgium | 1 | 2% |
Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 2% |
Mexico | 1 | 2% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 26 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 33 | 70% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 23% |
Scientists | 2 | 4% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 267 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 266 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 43 | 16% |
Student > Master | 38 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 7% |
Researcher | 17 | 6% |
Other | 13 | 5% |
Other | 40 | 15% |
Unknown | 97 | 36% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 59 | 22% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 29 | 11% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 19 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 7% |
Unspecified | 4 | 1% |
Other | 29 | 11% |
Unknown | 108 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 78. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2022.
All research outputs
#549,986
of 25,542,788 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Cancer
#159
of 10,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,015
of 241,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Cancer
#4
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,542,788 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,992 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,859 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.