↓ Skip to main content

Spanish Mediterranean diet and other dietary patterns and breast cancer risk: case–control EpiGEICAM study

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Cancer, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
twitter
48 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
150 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
276 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Spanish Mediterranean diet and other dietary patterns and breast cancer risk: case–control EpiGEICAM study
Published in
British Journal of Cancer, August 2014
DOI 10.1038/bjc.2014.434
Pubmed ID
Authors

A Castelló, M Pollán, B Buijsse, A Ruiz, A M Casas, J M Baena-Cañada, V Lope, S Antolín, M Ramos, M Muñoz, A Lluch, A de Juan-Ferré, C Jara, M A Jimeno, P Rosado, E Díaz, V Guillem, E Carrasco, B Pérez-Gómez, J Vioque, H Boeing, M Martín

Abstract

Although there are solid findings regarding the detrimental effect of alcohol consumption, the existing evidence on the effect of other dietary factors on breast cancer (BC) risk is inconclusive. This study aimed to evaluate the association between dietary patterns and risk of BC in Spanish women, stratifying by menopausal status and tumour subtype, and to compare the results with those of Alternate Healthy Index (AHEI) and Alternate Mediterranean Diet Score (aMED).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 276 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 275 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 43 16%
Student > Master 39 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 7%
Researcher 18 7%
Other 15 5%
Other 40 14%
Unknown 101 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 60 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 2%
Other 29 11%
Unknown 112 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 79. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2022.
All research outputs
#550,411
of 25,727,480 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Cancer
#158
of 11,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,966
of 242,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Cancer
#3
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,727,480 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,043 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.