↓ Skip to main content

Spanish Mediterranean diet and other dietary patterns and breast cancer risk: case–control EpiGEICAM study

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Cancer, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
55 tweeters
facebook
5 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
91 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
149 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Spanish Mediterranean diet and other dietary patterns and breast cancer risk: case–control EpiGEICAM study
Published in
British Journal of Cancer, August 2014
DOI 10.1038/bjc.2014.434
Pubmed ID
Authors

A Castelló, M Pollán, B Buijsse, A Ruiz, A M Casas, J M Baena-Cañada, V Lope, S Antolín, M Ramos, M Muñoz, A Lluch, A de Juan-Ferré, C Jara, M A Jimeno, P Rosado, E Díaz, V Guillem, E Carrasco, B Pérez-Gómez, J Vioque, H Boeing, M Martín

Abstract

Although there are solid findings regarding the detrimental effect of alcohol consumption, the existing evidence on the effect of other dietary factors on breast cancer (BC) risk is inconclusive. This study aimed to evaluate the association between dietary patterns and risk of BC in Spanish women, stratifying by menopausal status and tumour subtype, and to compare the results with those of Alternate Healthy Index (AHEI) and Alternate Mediterranean Diet Score (aMED).

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 55 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 148 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 33 22%
Student > Master 32 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 12%
Researcher 12 8%
Other 8 5%
Other 28 19%
Unknown 18 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Other 22 15%
Unknown 27 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2018.
All research outputs
#416,727
of 17,577,937 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Cancer
#141
of 9,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,248
of 201,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Cancer
#5
of 130 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,577,937 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,405 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,083 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 130 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.