↓ Skip to main content

Mio-Pliocene Faunal Exchanges and African Biogeography: The Record of Fossil Bovids

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mio-Pliocene Faunal Exchanges and African Biogeography: The Record of Fossil Bovids
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0016688
Pubmed ID
Authors

Faysal Bibi

Abstract

The development of the Ethiopian biogeographic realm since the late Miocene is here explored with the presentation and review of fossil evidence from eastern Africa. Prostrepsiceros cf. vinayaki and an unknown species of possible caprin affinity are described from the hominid-bearing Asa Koma and Kuseralee Members (∼5.7 and ∼5.2 Ma) of the Middle Awash, Ethiopia. The Middle Awash Prostrepsiceros cf. vinayaki constitutes the first record of this taxon from Africa, previously known from the Siwaliks and Arabia. The possible caprin joins a number of isolated records of caprin or caprin-like taxa recorded, but poorly understood, from the late Neogene of Africa. The identification of these two taxa from the Middle Awash prompts an overdue review of fossil bovids from the sub-Saharan African record that demonstrate Eurasian affinities, including the reduncin Kobus porrecticornis, and species of Tragoportax. The fossil bovid record provides evidence for greater biological continuity between Africa and Eurasia in the late Miocene and earliest Pliocene than is found later in time. In contrast, the early Pliocene (after 5 Ma) saw the loss of any significant proportions of Eurasian-related taxa, and the continental dominance of African-endemic taxa and lineages, a pattern that continues today.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 88 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 27%
Researcher 22 23%
Student > Master 8 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 6%
Student > Bachelor 5 5%
Other 18 19%
Unknown 10 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 45 48%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 15 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 5%
Arts and Humanities 5 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 4%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 12 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2023.
All research outputs
#2,599,371
of 24,294,767 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#32,481
of 209,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,950
of 109,505 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#253
of 1,308 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,294,767 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 209,335 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,505 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,308 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.