↓ Skip to main content

Whale shark economics: a valuation of wildlife tourism in South Ari Atoll, Maldives

Overview of attention for article published in PeerJ, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
17 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
25 tweeters
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
8 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Whale shark economics: a valuation of wildlife tourism in South Ari Atoll, Maldives
Published in
PeerJ, August 2014
DOI 10.7717/peerj.515
Pubmed ID
Authors

Edgar Fernando Cagua, Neal Collins, James Hancock, Richard Rees

Abstract

Whale sharks attract large numbers of tourists, divers and snorkelers each year to South Ari Atoll in the Republic of Maldives. Yet without information regarding the use and economic extent of the attraction, it is difficult to prioritize conservation or implement effective management plans. We used empirical recreational data and generalized mixed statistical models to conduct the first economic valuation (with direct spend as the primary proxy) of whale shark tourism in Maldives. We estimated that direct expenditures for whale shark focused tourism in the South Ari Marine Protected Area for 2012 and 2013 accounted for US$7.6 and $9.4 million respectively. These expenditures are based on an estimate of 72,000-78,000 tourists who are involved in whale shark excursions annually. That substantial amount of income to resort owners and operators, and tourism businesses in a relatively small area highlights the need to implement regulations and management that safeguard the sustainability of the industry through ensuring guest satisfaction and whale shark conservation.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 1%
Unknown 93 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 26%
Researcher 23 24%
Student > Bachelor 14 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 13%
Student > Postgraduate 6 6%
Other 16 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 45 46%
Environmental Science 27 28%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 7%
Unspecified 5 5%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Other 9 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 163. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2018.
All research outputs
#65,543
of 11,581,513 outputs
Outputs from PeerJ
#129
of 5,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,286
of 189,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PeerJ
#8
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,581,513 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,889 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.