You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Stardust Interstellar Preliminary Examination X: Impact speeds and directions of interstellar grains on the Stardust dust collector
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Meteoritics & Planetary Science, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1111/maps.12219 |
| Authors |
Veerle J. Sterken, Andrew J. Westphal, Nicolas Altobelli, Eberhard Grün, Jon K. Hillier, Frank Postberg, Ralf Srama, Carlton Allen, David Anderson, Asna Ansari, Saša Bajt, Ron S. Bastien, Nabil Bassim, Hans A. Bechtel, Janet Borg, Frank E. Brenker, John Bridges, Donald E. Brownlee, Mark Burchell, Manfred Burghammer, Anna L. Butterworth, Hitesh Changela, Peter Cloetens, Andrew M. Davis, Ryan Doll, Christine Floss, George Flynn, David Frank, Zack Gainsforth, Philipp R. Heck, Peter Hoppe, Bruce Hudson, Joachim Huth, Brit Hvide, Anton Kearsley, Ashley J. King, Barry Lai, Jan Leitner, Laurence Lemelle, Hugues Leroux, Ariel Leonard, Robert Lettieri, William Marchant, Larry R. Nittler, Ryan Ogliore, Wei Ja Ong, Mark C. Price, S. A. Sandford, Juan‐Angel Sans Tresseras, Sylvia Schmitz, Tom Schoonjans, Geert Silversmit, Alexandre Simionovici, Vicente A. Solé, Thomas Stephan, Julien Stodolna, Rhonda M. Stroud, Steven Sutton, Mario Trieloff, Peter Tsou, Akira Tsuchiyama, Tolek Tyliszczak, Bart Vekemans, Laszlo Vincze, Joshua Von Korff, Naomi Wordsworth, Daniel Zevin, Michael E. Zolensky, 000 Stardust@home dusters > 30 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Austria | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 28 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 47% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Professor | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 8 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 11 | 37% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 17% |
| Materials Science | 3 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 10 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2014.
All research outputs
#16,041,317
of 25,460,914 outputs
Outputs from Meteoritics & Planetary Science
#1,129
of 1,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,651
of 243,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Meteoritics & Planetary Science
#13
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,460,914 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,394 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,685 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.