You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A national Programme Budgeting and Marginal Analysis (PBMA) of health improvement spending across Wales: disinvestment and reinvestment across the life course
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, August 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-14-837 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Rhiannon Tudor Edwards, Joanna M Charles, Sara Thomas, Julie Bishop, David Cohen, Sam Groves, Ciaran Humphreys, Helen Howson, Peter Bradley |
Abstract |
Wales faces serious public health challenges, with relatively low life expectancies and wide inequalities in life expectancy with associated pressures on the National Health Service (NHS) at a time of financial recession. This has led to growing recognition of the need to better understand the range of health improvement and prevention programmes across Welsh Government, NHS, local government and voluntary sector agencies. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 43% |
Australia | 1 | 14% |
United States | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 4 | 57% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 29% |
Members of the public | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
Colombia | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 154 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 33 | 21% |
Researcher | 19 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 11% |
Other | 9 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 5% |
Other | 28 | 18% |
Unknown | 43 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 20% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 11% |
Social Sciences | 16 | 10% |
Psychology | 8 | 5% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 3% |
Other | 27 | 17% |
Unknown | 51 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2015.
All research outputs
#6,059,266
of 22,760,687 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#6,259
of 14,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,398
of 231,106 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#98
of 279 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,760,687 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,834 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,106 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 279 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.