↓ Skip to main content

Genome-wide genotype and sequence-based reconstruction of the 140,000 year history of modern human ancestry

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
24 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genome-wide genotype and sequence-based reconstruction of the 140,000 year history of modern human ancestry
Published in
Scientific Reports, August 2014
DOI 10.1038/srep06055
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel Shriner, Fasil Tekola-Ayele, Adebowale Adeyemo, Charles N. Rotimi

Abstract

We investigated ancestry of 3,528 modern humans from 163 samples. We identified 19 ancestral components, with 94.4% of individuals showing mixed ancestry. After using whole genome sequences to correct for ascertainment biases in genome-wide genotype data, we dated the oldest divergence event to 140,000 years ago. We detected an Out-of-Africa migration 100,000-87,000 years ago, leading to peoples of the Americas, east and north Asia, and Oceania, followed by another migration 61,000-44,000 years ago, leading to peoples of the Caucasus, Europe, the Middle East, and south Asia. We dated eight divergence events to 33,000-20,000 years ago, coincident with the Last Glacial Maximum. We refined understanding of the ancestry of several ethno-linguistic groups, including African Americans, Ethiopians, the Kalash, Latin Americans, Mozabites, Pygmies, and Uygurs, as well as the CEU sample. Ubiquity of mixed ancestry emphasizes the importance of accounting for ancestry in history, forensics, and health.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 4%
Germany 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Chile 1 1%
Greece 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 75 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 18%
Student > Master 13 16%
Student > Postgraduate 7 8%
Other 6 7%
Other 15 18%
Unknown 9 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 6%
Computer Science 3 4%
Arts and Humanities 2 2%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 15 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,606,206
of 24,505,736 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#15,064
of 133,598 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,346
of 236,006 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#79
of 756 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,505,736 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 133,598 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,006 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 756 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.