↓ Skip to main content

MODMatcher: Multi-Omics Data Matcher for Integrative Genomic Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
20 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
MODMatcher: Multi-Omics Data Matcher for Integrative Genomic Analysis
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, August 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003790
Pubmed ID
Authors

Seungyeul Yoo, Tao Huang, Joshua D. Campbell, Eunjee Lee, Zhidong Tu, Mark W. Geraci, Charles A. Powell, Eric E. Schadt, Avrum Spira, Jun Zhu

Abstract

Errors in sample annotation or labeling often occur in large-scale genetic or genomic studies and are difficult to avoid completely during data generation and management. For integrative genomic studies, it is critical to identify and correct these errors. Different types of genetic and genomic data are inter-connected by cis-regulations. On that basis, we developed a computational approach, Multi-Omics Data Matcher (MODMatcher), to identify and correct sample labeling errors in multiple types of molecular data, which can be used in further integrative analysis. Our results indicate that inspection of sample annotation and labeling error is an indispensable data quality assurance step. Applied to a large lung genomic study, MODMatcher increased statistically significant genetic associations and genomic correlations by more than two-fold. In a simulation study, MODMatcher provided more robust results by using three types of omics data than two types of omics data. We further demonstrate that MODMatcher can be broadly applied to large genomic data sets containing multiple types of omics data, such as The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data sets.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 6%
Turkey 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Argentina 1 1%
Unknown 76 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 20%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Professor 5 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 14 17%
Unknown 9 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 45%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 12%
Computer Science 5 6%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 12 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2019.
All research outputs
#1,764,207
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#1,515
of 8,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,575
of 243,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#20
of 159 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,821 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 159 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.