↓ Skip to main content

ReaDDy - A Software for Particle-Based Reaction-Diffusion Dynamics in Crowded Cellular Environments

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
121 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
144 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ReaDDy - A Software for Particle-Based Reaction-Diffusion Dynamics in Crowded Cellular Environments
Published in
PLOS ONE, September 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0074261
Pubmed ID
Authors

Johannes Schöneberg, Frank Noé

Abstract

We introduce the software package ReaDDy for simulation of detailed spatiotemporal mechanisms of dynamical processes in the cell, based on reaction-diffusion dynamics with particle resolution. In contrast to other particle-based reaction kinetics programs, ReaDDy supports particle interaction potentials. This permits effects such as space exclusion, molecular crowding and aggregation to be modeled. The biomolecules simulated can be represented as a sphere, or as a more complex geometry such as a domain structure or polymer chain. ReaDDy bridges the gap between small-scale but highly detailed molecular dynamics or Brownian dynamics simulations and large-scale but little-detailed reaction kinetics simulations. ReaDDy has a modular design that enables the exchange of the computing core by efficient platform-specific implementations or dynamical models that are different from Brownian dynamics.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 3%
Germany 3 2%
Colombia 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 130 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 26%
Researcher 33 23%
Student > Master 17 12%
Student > Bachelor 13 9%
Professor 12 8%
Other 19 13%
Unknown 12 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 29 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 14%
Chemistry 17 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 11%
Computer Science 11 8%
Other 31 22%
Unknown 20 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2023.
All research outputs
#7,163,125
of 23,383,275 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#86,930
of 199,942 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,286
of 199,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,846
of 4,987 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,383,275 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 199,942 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,999 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,987 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.