You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Primary forests are irreplaceable for sustaining tropical biodiversity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, September 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nature10425 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Luke Gibson, Tien Ming Lee, Lian Pin Koh, Barry W. Brook, Toby A. Gardner, Jos Barlow, Carlos A. Peres, Corey J. A. Bradshaw, William F. Laurance, Thomas E. Lovejoy, Navjot S. Sodhi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 50 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 14% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 4% |
| Australia | 2 | 4% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| Taiwan | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 28 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 36 | 72% |
| Scientists | 11 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3,035 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 48 | 2% |
| United States | 33 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 21 | <1% |
| Canada | 8 | <1% |
| Spain | 7 | <1% |
| Australia | 7 | <1% |
| France | 6 | <1% |
| Colombia | 4 | <1% |
| Germany | 4 | <1% |
| Other | 45 | 1% |
| Unknown | 2852 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 555 | 18% |
| Researcher | 505 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 502 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 345 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 173 | 6% |
| Other | 482 | 16% |
| Unknown | 473 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1257 | 41% |
| Environmental Science | 817 | 27% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 98 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 52 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 40 | 1% |
| Other | 174 | 6% |
| Unknown | 597 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 248. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2023.
All research outputs
#152,440
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#9,638
of 99,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#476
of 140,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#33
of 906 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 99,074 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 140,974 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 906 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.