You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Serum 14-3-3η is a Novel Marker that Complements Current Serological Measurements to Enhance Detection of Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Rheumatology, August 2014
|
DOI | 10.3899/jrheum.131446 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Walter P Maksymowych, Stanley J Naides, Vivian Bykerk, Katherine A Siminovitch, Dirkjan van Schaardenburg, Maarten Boers, Robert Landewé, Désirée van der Heijde, Paul-P Tak, Mark C Genovese, Michael E Weinblatt, Edward C Keystone, Olga S Zhukov, Rania W Abolhosn, Joanna M Popov, Karin Britsemmer, Arno W van Kuijk, Anthony Marotta |
Abstract |
Serum 14-3-3η is a novel joint-derived proinflammatory mediator implicated in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In our study, we assessed the diagnostic utility of 14-3-3η and its association with standard clinical and serological measures. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 27% |
Canada | 2 | 18% |
United States | 1 | 9% |
South Africa | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 55% |
Scientists | 2 | 18% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 18% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
Colombia | 1 | 1% |
Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
Germany | 1 | 1% |
Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | 1% |
Russia | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 83 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 16 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 16% |
Other | 10 | 11% |
Student > Master | 9 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 9% |
Other | 14 | 16% |
Unknown | 19 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 33% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 13% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 13% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 4% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 3% |
Other | 7 | 8% |
Unknown | 22 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2017.
All research outputs
#1,169,042
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Rheumatology
#77
of 3,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,426
of 243,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Rheumatology
#1
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,951 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,218 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.