↓ Skip to main content

Modest cooling therapies (35ºC to 37.5ºC) for traumatic brain injury

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
9 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Modest cooling therapies (35ºC to 37.5ºC) for traumatic brain injury
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006811.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Manoj Saxena, Peter JD Andrews, Andrew Cheng, Kiran Deol, Naomi Hammond

Abstract

Animal models of traumatic brain injury suggest that induced normothermia (36.5 or 37 ºC), compared to induced hyperthermia (39 ºC), improves histopathological and neurobehavioural outcomes. Observational clinical studies of patients with TBI suggest an association between raised body temperature and unfavourable outcome, although this relationship is inconsistent.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 55 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 23%
Student > Master 9 16%
Researcher 8 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 12%
Student > Postgraduate 6 11%
Other 14 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 51%
Unspecified 6 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 9%
Neuroscience 4 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Other 10 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2019.
All research outputs
#2,022,416
of 12,819,488 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,839
of 10,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,625
of 199,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#124
of 214 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,819,488 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,431 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,078 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 214 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.