↓ Skip to main content

Surgical versus medical methods for second trimester induced abortion

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
126 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
165 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Surgical versus medical methods for second trimester induced abortion
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2008
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006714.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patricia A. Lohr, Jennifer L Hayes, Kristina Gemzell‐Danielsson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 163 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 15%
Student > Master 22 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 9%
Student > Bachelor 11 7%
Other 29 18%
Unknown 46 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 62 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 8%
Social Sciences 10 6%
Psychology 7 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 14 8%
Unknown 55 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2021.
All research outputs
#1,653,174
of 25,390,203 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,582
of 12,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,482
of 167,478 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#15
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,390,203 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,712 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,478 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.