↓ Skip to main content

Surgical versus medical methods for second trimester induced abortion

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
99 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Surgical versus medical methods for second trimester induced abortion
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2008
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006714.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patricia A. Lohr, Jennifer L Hayes, Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 82 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 20%
Student > Master 13 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 12%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 11%
Other 17 20%
Unknown 9 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 51%
Social Sciences 8 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 7%
Psychology 4 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 4%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 13 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2018.
All research outputs
#837,094
of 13,778,239 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,602
of 10,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,040
of 199,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#52
of 221 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,778,239 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,743 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,665 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 221 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.