You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Climate change and the emergence of vector-borne diseases in Europe: case study of dengue fever
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-14-781 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maha Bouzid, Felipe J Colón-González, Tobias Lung, Iain R Lake, Paul R Hunter |
| Abstract |
Dengue fever is the most prevalent mosquito-borne viral disease worldwide. Dengue transmission is critically dependent on climatic factors and there is much concern as to whether climate change would spread the disease to areas currently unaffected. The occurrence of autochthonous infections in Croatia and France in 2010 has raised concerns about a potential re-emergence of dengue in Europe. The objective of this study is to estimate dengue risk in Europe under climate change scenarios. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 19% |
| Australia | 3 | 11% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Mexico | 1 | 4% |
| Ireland | 1 | 4% |
| Belgium | 1 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 14 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 78% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 15% |
| Scientists | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 426 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 1% |
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 413 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 67 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 64 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 61 | 14% |
| Researcher | 60 | 14% |
| Other | 24 | 6% |
| Other | 59 | 14% |
| Unknown | 91 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 74 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 65 | 15% |
| Environmental Science | 40 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 28 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 6% |
| Other | 93 | 22% |
| Unknown | 102 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 151. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2023.
All research outputs
#277,358
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#249
of 17,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,329
of 251,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#3
of 289 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,876 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,322 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 289 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.