↓ Skip to main content

Smart-Phone Obesity Prevention Trial for Adolescent Boys in Low-Income Communities: The ATLAS RCT

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatrics, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
13 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
97 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
302 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Smart-Phone Obesity Prevention Trial for Adolescent Boys in Low-Income Communities: The ATLAS RCT
Published in
Pediatrics, August 2014
DOI 10.1542/peds.2014-1012
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. J. Smith, P. J. Morgan, R. C. Plotnikoff, K. A. Dally, J. Salmon, A. D. Okely, T. L. Finn, D. R. Lubans

Abstract

The goal of this study was to evaluate the impact of the Active Teen Leaders Avoiding Screen-time (ATLAS) intervention for adolescent boys, an obesity prevention intervention using smartphone technology.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 302 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 296 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 83 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 16%
Researcher 35 12%
Unspecified 34 11%
Student > Bachelor 30 10%
Other 73 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 59 20%
Unspecified 54 18%
Sports and Recreations 47 16%
Psychology 38 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 37 12%
Other 67 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2019.
All research outputs
#2,000,215
of 13,157,264 outputs
Outputs from Pediatrics
#5,105
of 12,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,310
of 199,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatrics
#94
of 155 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,157,264 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,411 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,671 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 155 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.