You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
Emotion Tag Based Music Retrieval Algorithm
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 56 |
Book title |
Information Retrieval Technology
|
Published in |
Lecture notes in computer science, January 2010
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-3-642-17187-1_56 |
Book ISBNs |
978-3-64-217186-4, 978-3-64-217187-1
|
Authors |
Jing Li, Hongfei Lin, Lijuan Zhou |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 50% |
Professor | 1 | 17% |
Student > Master | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Computer Science | 3 | 50% |
Chemical Engineering | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2012.
All research outputs
#20,167,959
of 22,679,690 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#6,982
of 8,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,607
of 163,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#157
of 188 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,679,690 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,122 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,549 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 188 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.