↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of Instream Methods for Measuring Hydraulic Conductivity in Sandy Streambeds

Overview of attention for article published in Ground Water, December 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#45 of 559)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
4 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
126 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of Instream Methods for Measuring Hydraulic Conductivity in Sandy Streambeds
Published in
Ground Water, December 2005
DOI 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2001.tb02475.x
Authors

Matthew K. Landon, David L. Rus, F. Edwin Harvey

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Malaysia 1 1%
Israel 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
India 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 87 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 29%
Student > Master 20 21%
Researcher 16 16%
Unspecified 11 11%
Professor 6 6%
Other 16 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 37 38%
Environmental Science 25 26%
Engineering 16 16%
Unspecified 13 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 3 3%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2016.
All research outputs
#2,202,514
of 12,553,167 outputs
Outputs from Ground Water
#45
of 559 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,729
of 199,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ground Water
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,553,167 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 559 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,763 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them