You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Therapeutic use of dolls for people living with dementia: A critical review of the literature
|
---|---|
Published in |
Dementia, July 2016
|
DOI | 10.1177/1471301214548522 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Gary Mitchell, Brendan McCormack, Tanya McCance |
Abstract |
There are a number of therapies currently available to assist healthcare professionals and carers with non-pharmacological treatment for people living with dementia. One such therapy that has been growing in clinical practice is doll therapy. Providing dolls to some people living with dementia has the potential to enhance personal well-being through increased levels of communication and engagement with others. Despite its potential for benefits, the practice is currently under-developed in healthcare literature, probably due to varied ethical interpretations of its practice. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 8 | 40% |
Spain | 2 | 10% |
United States | 2 | 10% |
Estonia | 1 | 5% |
Australia | 1 | 5% |
Mexico | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 5 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 9 | 45% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 30% |
Scientists | 4 | 20% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 136 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 27 | 20% |
Student > Master | 25 | 18% |
Researcher | 14 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 10% |
Other | 9 | 7% |
Other | 22 | 16% |
Unknown | 25 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 39 | 29% |
Psychology | 26 | 19% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 13% |
Social Sciences | 8 | 6% |
Computer Science | 4 | 3% |
Other | 12 | 9% |
Unknown | 29 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 366. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2022.
All research outputs
#86,842
of 25,402,889 outputs
Outputs from Dementia
#1
of 1,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,857
of 379,828 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Dementia
#1
of 147 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,402,889 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,254 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 379,828 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 147 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.