↓ Skip to main content

Risk assessment of groundwater pollution with a new methodological framework: application of Dempster–Shafer theory and GIS

Overview of attention for article published in Natural Hazards, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Risk assessment of groundwater pollution with a new methodological framework: application of Dempster–Shafer theory and GIS
Published in
Natural Hazards, May 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-1788-5
Authors

Aminreza Neshat, Biswajeet Pradhan

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 2%
Unknown 46 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 21%
Researcher 6 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 11 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 13 28%
Environmental Science 9 19%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 15 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2021.
All research outputs
#15,479,632
of 23,002,898 outputs
Outputs from Natural Hazards
#1,303
of 1,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,088
of 265,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Hazards
#22
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,002,898 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,831 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,135 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.