| Title |
Integrated collaborative care for comorbid major depression in patients with cancer (SMaRT Oncology-2): a multicentre randomised controlled effectiveness trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(14)61231-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael Sharpe, Jane Walker, Christian Holm Hansen, Paul Martin, Stefan Symeonides, Charlie Gourley, Lucy Wall, David Weller, Gordon Murray, for the SMaRT Oncology-2 Team |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 13 | 28% |
| United States | 6 | 13% |
| Canada | 3 | 7% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 4% |
| Mexico | 2 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 4% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 1 | 2% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 12 | 26% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 30 | 65% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 20% |
| Scientists | 6 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 371 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Uruguay | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 362 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 63 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 45 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 40 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 28 | 8% |
| Other | 84 | 23% |
| Unknown | 72 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 108 | 29% |
| Psychology | 72 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 39 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 51 | 14% |
| Unknown | 81 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 169. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2019.
All research outputs
#243,966
of 25,708,267 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#2,723
of 42,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,009
of 247,934 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#32
of 484 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,708,267 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,943 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 68.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,934 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 484 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.