You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Transmission of Novel Influenza A(H1N1) in Households with Post-Exposure Antiviral Prophylaxis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, July 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0011442 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michiel van Boven, Tjibbe Donker, Mariken van der Lubben, Rianne B. van Gageldonk-Lafeber, Dennis E. te Beest, Marion Koopmans, Adam Meijer, Aura Timen, Corien Swaan, Anton Dalhuijsen, Susan Hahné, Anneke van den Hoek, Peter Teunis, Marianne A. B. van der Sande, Jacco Wallinga |
| Abstract |
Despite impressive advances in our understanding of the biology of novel influenza A(H1N1) virus, little is as yet known about its transmission efficiency in close contact places such as households, schools, and workplaces. These are widely believed to be key in supporting propagating spread, and it is therefore of importance to assess the transmission levels of the virus in such settings. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 10% |
| Australia | 3 | 6% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 39 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 33% |
| Researcher | 12 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 6% |
| Professor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 7 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 20% |
| Mathematics | 6 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 18% |
| Unknown | 8 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2011.
All research outputs
#5,381,103
of 22,761,738 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#63,922
of 194,198 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,581
of 94,395 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#274
of 726 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,761,738 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,198 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,395 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 726 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.