You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A critique of methods for temperature imaging in single cells
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Methods, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nmeth.3073 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Guillaume Baffou, Hervé Rigneault, Didier Marguet, Ludovic Jullien |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 4 | 20% |
| Sweden | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Vanuatu | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| China | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 11 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 85% |
| Scientists | 3 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 269 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 258 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 71 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 51 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 7% |
| Professor | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 42 | 16% |
| Unknown | 42 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 79 | 29% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 30 | 11% |
| Engineering | 30 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 27 | 10% |
| Chemistry | 18 | 7% |
| Other | 30 | 11% |
| Unknown | 55 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,255,461
of 25,931,626 outputs
Outputs from Nature Methods
#1,590
of 5,440 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,319
of 248,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Methods
#26
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,931,626 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,440 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,990 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.