↓ Skip to main content

A hydrogeomorphic river network model predicts where and why hyporheic exchange is important in large basins

Overview of attention for article published in Geophysical Research Letters, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
145 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
168 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A hydrogeomorphic river network model predicts where and why hyporheic exchange is important in large basins
Published in
Geophysical Research Letters, September 2014
DOI 10.1002/2014gl061099
Authors

Jesus D. Gomez‐Velez, Judson W. Harvey

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 165 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 57 34%
Researcher 29 17%
Student > Master 17 10%
Professor 7 4%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 4%
Other 24 14%
Unknown 27 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 56 33%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 43 26%
Engineering 27 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 5%
Physics and Astronomy 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 31 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2022.
All research outputs
#16,681,672
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Geophysical Research Letters
#15,142
of 22,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,130
of 264,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geophysical Research Letters
#123
of 248 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,223 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.0. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,967 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 248 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.