↓ Skip to main content

Carbon nanotube-incorporated collagen hydrogels improve cell alignment and the performance of cardiac constructs

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Nanomedicine, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Carbon nanotube-incorporated collagen hydrogels improve cell alignment and the performance of cardiac constructs
Published in
International Journal of Nanomedicine, April 2017
DOI 10.2147/ijn.s128030
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hongyu Sun, Jing Zhou, Zhu Huang, Linlin Qu, Ning Lin, Chengxiao Liang, Ruiwu Dai, Lijun Tang, Fuzhou Tian

Abstract

Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) provide an essential 2-D microenvironment for cardiomyocyte growth and function. However, it remains to be elucidated whether CNT nanostructures can promote cell-cell integrity and facilitate the formation of functional tissues in 3-D hydrogels. Here, single-walled CNTs were incorporated into collagen hydrogels to fabricate (CNT/Col) hydrogels, which improved mechanical and electrical properties. The incorporation of CNTs (up to 1 wt%) exhibited no toxicity to cardiomyocytes and enhanced cell adhesion and elongation. Through the use of immunohistochemical staining, transmission electron microscopy, and intracellular calcium-transient measurement, the incorporation of CNTs was found to improve cell alignment and assembly remarkably, which led to the formation of engineered cardiac tissues with stronger contraction potential. Importantly, cardiac tissues based on CNT/Col hydrogels were noted to have better functionality. Collectively, the incorporation of CNTs into the Col hydrogels improved cell alignment and the performance of cardiac constructs. Our study suggests that CNT/Col hydrogels offer a promising tissue scaffold for cardiac constructs, and might serve as injectable biomaterials to deliver cell or drug molecules for cardiac regeneration following myocardial infarction in the near future.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 116 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 13%
Student > Bachelor 15 13%
Researcher 13 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 37 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 15 13%
Materials Science 13 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 9%
Chemistry 8 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Other 26 22%
Unknown 38 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2017.
All research outputs
#20,660,571
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#3,127
of 4,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#249,416
of 323,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#65
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,122 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,961 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.