↓ Skip to main content

Confirmed efficacy of etoposide and dexamethasone in HLH treatment: long-term results of the cooperative HLH-2004 study

Overview of attention for article published in Blood, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
61 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
461 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
298 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Confirmed efficacy of etoposide and dexamethasone in HLH treatment: long-term results of the cooperative HLH-2004 study
Published in
Blood, September 2017
DOI 10.1182/blood-2017-06-788349
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elisabet Bergsten, AnnaCarin Horne, Maurizio Aricó, Itziar Astigarraga, R Maarten Egeler, Alexandra H Filipovich, Eiichi Ishii, Gritta Janka, Stephan Ladisch, Kai Lehmberg, Kenneth L McClain, Milen Minkov, Scott Montgomery, Vasanta Nanduri, Diego Rosso, Jan-Inge Henter

Abstract

Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a life-threatening hyperinflammatory syndrome comprising familial/genetic HLH (FHL) and secondary HLH. In the HLH-94 study, with an estimated 5-year probability of survival (pSu) of 54% (95% CI, 48-60%), systemic therapy included etoposide, dexamethasone and, from week nine, cyclosporine A (CSA). HSCT was indicated in patients with familial/genetic, relapsing, or severe and persistent disease. In HLH-2004, CSA was instead administered upfront, aiming to reduce pre-HSCT mortality and morbidity. During 2004-2011, 369 children aged <18-years fulfilled the HLH-2004 inclusion criteria (5/8 diagnostic criteria, affected siblings, and/or molecular diagnosis in FHL-causative genes). At a median follow-up of 5.2 years, 230/369 (62%) patients were alive (5-year pSu 61%, 56-67%). The 5-year pSu in children with (n=168) and without (n=201) family history/genetically verified FHL was 59% (52-67%) and 64% (57-71%), respectively [familial occurrence (n=47): 58% (45-75%)]. Comparing with historical data (HLH-94), using HLH-94 inclusion criteria, pre-HSCT mortality was non-significantly reduced from 27% to 19% (P=.064 adjusted for age and gender). Time from start of therapy to HSCT was shorter compared to HLH-94 (P=.020 adjusted for age and gender) and reported neurological alterations at HSCT were 22% in HLH-94 and 17% in HLH-2004 (using HLH-94 inclusion criteria). Five-year pSu post-HSCT overall was 66% [verified FHL 70% (63-78%)]. Additional analyses provided specific suggestions on potential pre-HSCT treatment improvements. HLH-2004 confirms that a majority of patients may be rescued by the etoposide/dexamethasone combination but intensification with CSA upfront, adding corticosteroids to intrathecal therapy, and reduced time to HSCT did not improve outcome significantly.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 61 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 298 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 298 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 55 18%
Student > Master 33 11%
Researcher 32 11%
Student > Postgraduate 28 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 8%
Other 66 22%
Unknown 59 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 154 52%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 2%
Other 30 10%
Unknown 75 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2023.
All research outputs
#873,645
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Blood
#596
of 33,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,870
of 325,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Blood
#19
of 234 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,329 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,903 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 234 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.