↓ Skip to main content

Surgical intervention versus expectant management for endometrial polyps in subfertile women

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Surgical intervention versus expectant management for endometrial polyps in subfertile women
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009592.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kannamannadiar Jayaprakasan, Lukasz Polanski, Banchhita Sahu, Jim G Thornton, Nick Raine-Fenning

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 116 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 14%
Researcher 15 13%
Student > Bachelor 13 11%
Other 8 7%
Other 18 16%
Unknown 29 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 7%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Psychology 4 3%
Other 13 11%
Unknown 35 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2023.
All research outputs
#6,754,661
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,898
of 11,483 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,128
of 247,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#156
of 210 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,483 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.9. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,718 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 210 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.