↓ Skip to main content

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for pain management in sickle cell disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for pain management in sickle cell disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2017
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012762
Authors

Sudipta Pal, Ruchita Dixit, Soe Moe, Myron A Godinho, Adinegara BL Abas, Samir K Ballas, Shanker Ram, Uduman Ali M Yousuf

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 18%
Student > Master 6 16%
Researcher 5 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Professor 2 5%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 12 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 21%
Psychology 4 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 12 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2017.
All research outputs
#17,350,971
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,863
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,002
of 326,362 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#191
of 203 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,362 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 203 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.