↓ Skip to main content

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for pain management in sickle cell disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for pain management in sickle cell disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2017
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012762
Authors

Sudipta Pal, Ruchita Dixit, Soe Moe, Myron A Godinho, Adinegara BL Abas, Samir K Ballas, Shanker Ram, Uduman Ali M Yousuf

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 50 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 20%
Student > Bachelor 8 16%
Researcher 5 10%
Student > Postgraduate 5 10%
Professor 3 6%
Other 10 20%
Unknown 10 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 20%
Psychology 4 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 12 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2017.
All research outputs
#7,860,201
of 12,527,219 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,403
of 9,882 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,341
of 268,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#126
of 139 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,219 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,882 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.5. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,584 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 139 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.