↓ Skip to main content

Care plans and care planning in the management of long-term conditions in the UK: a controlled prospective cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
16 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Care plans and care planning in the management of long-term conditions in the UK: a controlled prospective cohort study
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, September 2014
DOI 10.3399/bjgp14x681385
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Reeves, Mark Hann, Jo Rick, Kelly Rowe, Nicola Small, Jenni Burt, Martin Roland, Joanne Protheroe, Tom Blakeman, Gerry Richardson, Anne Kennedy, Peter Bower

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 50 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 24%
Other 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 12%
Researcher 5 10%
Professor 4 8%
Other 18 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 22%
Social Sciences 9 18%
Psychology 5 10%
Unspecified 4 8%
Other 5 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 58. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2015.
All research outputs
#274,593
of 12,981,426 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#127
of 2,756 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,069
of 200,861 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#2
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,981,426 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,756 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,861 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.