You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Developing robust field survey protocols in landscape ecology: a case study on birds, plants and butterflies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-014-0786-3 |
| Authors |
Jacqueline Loos, Jan Hanspach, Henrik von Wehrden, Monica Beldean, Cosmin Ioan Moga, Joern Fischer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 3 | 2% |
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Latvia | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 125 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 36 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 14% |
| Unknown | 16 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 65 | 47% |
| Environmental Science | 39 | 28% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 1% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Unknown | 21 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2014.
All research outputs
#4,029,651
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#620
of 2,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,986
of 239,667 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#10
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,667 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.