↓ Skip to main content

The emergence of dynamic phenotyping

Overview of attention for article published in Cell Biology and Toxicology, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The emergence of dynamic phenotyping
Published in
Cell Biology and Toxicology, September 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10565-017-9413-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel Ruderman

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 33%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Unknown 5 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 8%
Computer Science 1 8%
Social Sciences 1 8%
Unknown 6 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2017.
All research outputs
#18,572,844
of 23,003,906 outputs
Outputs from Cell Biology and Toxicology
#365
of 486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#245,113
of 319,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Biology and Toxicology
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,003,906 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 486 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,593 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.