↓ Skip to main content

New intrinsic mechanism on gum-like superelasticity of multifunctional alloys

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
New intrinsic mechanism on gum-like superelasticity of multifunctional alloys
Published in
Scientific Reports, July 2013
DOI 10.1038/srep02156
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jia-Peng Liu, Yan-Dong Wang, Yu-Lin Hao, Yunzhi Wang, Zhi-Hua Nie, Dong Wang, Yang Ren, Zhao-Ping Lu, Jinguo Wang, Haoliang Wang, Xidong Hui, Ning Lu, Moon J. Kim, Rui Yang

Abstract

Ti-Nb-based Gum Metals exhibit extraordinary superelasticity with ultralow elastic modulus, superior strength and ductility, and a peculiar dislocation-free deformation behavior, most of which challenge existing theories of crystal strength. Additionally, this kind of alloys actually displays even more anomalous mechanical properties, such as the non-linear superelastic behavior, accompanied by a pronounced tension-to-compression asymmetry, and large ductility with a low Poisson's ratio. Two main contradictory arguments exist concerning the deformation mechanisms of those alloys, i.e., formation of reversible nanodisturbance and reversible martensitic transformation. Herein we used the in-situ synchrotron high-energy X-ray scattering technique to reveal the novel intrinsic physical origin of all anomalous mechanical properties of the Ti-24Nb-4Zr-8Sn-0.10O alloy, a typical gum-like metal. Our experiments provide direct evidence on two different kinds of interesting, stress-induced, reversible nanoscale martensitic transitions, i.e., the austenitic regions with B2 structure transform to α″ martensite and those with BCC structure transform to δ martensite.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Czechia 1 1%
Unknown 75 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 21%
Student > Master 13 17%
Researcher 12 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Professor 6 8%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 14 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 35 45%
Engineering 9 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Physics and Astronomy 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 25 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2014.
All research outputs
#20,235,415
of 22,761,738 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#104,905
of 122,799 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,410
of 194,233 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#452
of 533 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,761,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 122,799 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,233 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 533 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.