↓ Skip to main content

Re-organisation of oesophago-gastric cancer services in England and Wales: a follow-up assessment of progress and remaining challenges

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Re-organisation of oesophago-gastric cancer services in England and Wales: a follow-up assessment of progress and remaining challenges
Published in
BMC Research Notes, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1756-0500-7-24
Pubmed ID
Authors

Oliver Groene, Georgina Chadwick, Stuart Riley, Richard H Hardwick, Tom Crosby, Kimberley Greenaway, William Allum, David A Cromwell

Abstract

This study is an update on an earlier article in 2007 to assess the implementation of the Cancer Plan reform strategy in England and Wales.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 30 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 22%
Student > Postgraduate 6 19%
Researcher 5 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 5 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 44%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 6%
Psychology 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 7 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2014.
All research outputs
#9,958,743
of 12,440,396 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#1,935
of 2,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,591
of 203,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#53
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,440,396 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,786 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 203,089 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.