You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Artificial lighting and disrupted sea-finding behaviour in hatchling loggerhead turtles (Caretta caretta) on the Woongarra coast, south-east Queensland, Australia
|
---|---|
Published in |
Australian Journal of Zoology, June 2013
|
DOI | 10.1071/zo13028 |
Authors |
Megan Berry, David T. Booth, Colin J. Limpus |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 2 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Brazil | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 87 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 24 | 26% |
Student > Master | 16 | 18% |
Researcher | 15 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 11% |
Other | 3 | 3% |
Other | 6 | 7% |
Unknown | 17 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 35 | 38% |
Environmental Science | 30 | 33% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 3% |
Engineering | 2 | 2% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 1% |
Other | 2 | 2% |
Unknown | 18 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2014.
All research outputs
#3,415,350
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Australian Journal of Zoology
#96
of 747 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,580
of 209,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Australian Journal of Zoology
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 747 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,404 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.