↓ Skip to main content

Determinants of health check attendance in adults: findings from the cross-sectional German Health Update (GEDA) study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
78 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
167 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Determinants of health check attendance in adults: findings from the cross-sectional German Health Update (GEDA) study
Published in
BMC Public Health, September 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-14-913
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jens Hoebel, Anne Starker, Susanne Jordan, Matthias Richter, Thomas Lampert

Abstract

In Germany, adult health checks are carried out in the primary care setting for early detection of chronic conditions, such as cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, and kidney disease. This study aims to examine the social, behavioural, and health-related determinants of health check attendance among eligible adults in Germany.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 163 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 39 23%
Researcher 28 17%
Student > Bachelor 17 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 8%
Other 8 5%
Other 27 16%
Unknown 35 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 16%
Social Sciences 26 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 2%
Other 16 10%
Unknown 43 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2023.
All research outputs
#6,669,272
of 24,522,750 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#6,940
of 16,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,631
of 242,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#104
of 286 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,522,750 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,201 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,838 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 286 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.