↓ Skip to main content

Melasma: a clinical and epidemiological review

Overview of attention for article published in Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
21 news outlets
twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
259 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
556 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Melasma: a clinical and epidemiological review
Published in
Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia, September 2014
DOI 10.1590/abd1806-4841.20143063
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ana Carolina Handel, Luciane Donida Bartoli Miot, Hélio Amante Miot

Abstract

Melasma is a chronic acquired hypermelanosis of the skin, characterized by irregular brown macules symmetrically distributed on sun-exposed areas of the body, particularly on the face. It is a common cause of demand for dermatological care that affects mainly women (especially during the menacme), and more pigmented phenotypes (Fitzpatrick skin types III-V). Due to its frequent facial involvement, the disease has an impact on the quality of life of patients. Its pathogeny is not yet completely understood, although there are some known triggering factors such as sun exposure, pregnancy, sexual hormones, inflammatory processes of the skin, use of cosmetics, steroids, and photosensitizing drugs. There is also a clear genetic predisposition, since over 40% of patients reported having relatives affected with the disease. In this manuscript, the authors discuss the main clinical and epidemiological aspects of melasma.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 556 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 <1%
Unknown 555 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 85 15%
Student > Master 53 10%
Student > Postgraduate 49 9%
Other 25 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 4%
Other 65 12%
Unknown 256 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 169 30%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 26 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 3%
Other 42 8%
Unknown 264 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 179. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2023.
All research outputs
#231,667
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia
#2
of 6 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,883
of 250,119 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.3. This one scored the same or higher as 4 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,119 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them