↓ Skip to main content

Canalization of Gene Expression and Domain Shifts in the Drosophila Blastoderm by Dynamical Attractors

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, March 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
207 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Canalization of Gene Expression and Domain Shifts in the Drosophila Blastoderm by Dynamical Attractors
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, March 2009
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000303
Pubmed ID
Authors

Manu, Svetlana Surkova, Alexander V. Spirov, Vitaly V. Gursky, Hilde Janssens, Ah-Ram Kim, Ovidiu Radulescu, Carlos E. Vanario-Alonso, David H. Sharp, Maria Samsonova, John Reinitz

Abstract

The variation in the expression patterns of the gap genes in the blastoderm of the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster reduces over time as a result of cross regulation between these genes, a fact that we have demonstrated in an accompanying article in PLoS Biology (see Manu et al., doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000049). This biologically essential process is an example of the phenomenon known as canalization. It has been suggested that the developmental trajectory of a wild-type organism is inherently stable, and that canalization is a manifestation of this property. Although the role of gap genes in the canalization process was established by correctly predicting the response of the system to particular perturbations, the stability of the developmental trajectory remains to be investigated. For many years, it has been speculated that stability against perturbations during development can be described by dynamical systems having attracting sets that drive reductions of volume in phase space. In this paper, we show that both the reduction in variability of gap gene expression as well as shifts in the position of posterior gap gene domains are the result of the actions of attractors in the gap gene dynamical system. Two biologically distinct dynamical regions exist in the early embryo, separated by a bifurcation at 53% egg length. In the anterior region, reduction in variation occurs because of stability induced by point attractors, while in the posterior, the stability of the developmental trajectory arises from a one-dimensional attracting manifold. This manifold also controls a previously characterized anterior shift of posterior region gap domains. Our analysis shows that the complex phenomena of canalization and pattern formation in the Drosophila blastoderm can be understood in terms of the qualitative features of the dynamical system. The result confirms the idea that attractors are important for developmental stability and shows a richer variety of dynamical attractors in developmental systems than has been previously recognized.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 6%
Germany 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 97 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 25%
Researcher 27 25%
Professor 9 8%
Student > Master 9 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 7%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 15 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 46 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 18%
Physics and Astronomy 11 10%
Computer Science 4 4%
Engineering 3 3%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 17 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2014.
All research outputs
#17,433,619
of 25,576,801 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#7,517
of 9,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,513
of 110,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#40
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,576,801 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,003 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,116 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.