↓ Skip to main content

The influence of mammogram acquisition on the mammographic density and breast cancer association in the mayo mammography health study cohort

Overview of attention for article published in Breast Cancer Research, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The influence of mammogram acquisition on the mammographic density and breast cancer association in the mayo mammography health study cohort
Published in
Breast Cancer Research, November 2012
DOI 10.1186/bcr3357
Pubmed ID
Authors

Olson JE, Sellers TA, Scott CG, Schueler BA, Brandt KR, Serie DJ, Jensen MR, Wu FF, Morton MJ, Heine JJ, Couch FJ, Pankratz VS, Vachon CM

Abstract

Mammographic density is a strong risk factor for breast cancer. Image acquisition technique varies across mammograms to limit radiation and produce a clinically useful image. We examined whether acquisition technique parameters at the time of mammography were associated with mammographic density and whether the acquisition parameters confounded the density and breast cancer association.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 3%
Unknown 39 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 18%
Student > Master 5 13%
Researcher 4 10%
Professor 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 10 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 25%
Sports and Recreations 4 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Physics and Astronomy 3 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Other 8 20%
Unknown 10 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2014.
All research outputs
#7,027,911
of 11,302,850 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research
#910
of 1,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,858
of 195,615 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research
#24
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,302,850 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,293 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,615 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.